Bibliografie pe internet 2
Jeppsson, N., I.V. Bartish, and
H.A. Persson. 1999. DNA analysis as a tool in sea buckthorn breeding. p.
338–341. In: J. Janick (ed.), Perspectives on new crops and new uses. ASHS
Press,
N. Jeppsson, I.V. Bartish, and H.A. Persson
Sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.,
Elaeagnaceae) is a dioecious windpollinated shrub with nitrogen fixing ability.
The berries have bright colors, varying from yellow, orange to red.
Domestication of sea buckthorn started in
RAPD METHODOLOGY
We use a standard method with the following steps
(Weising et al. 1995):
- DNA
isolation and purification, using fresh or frozen leaves.
- Enzymatic
amplification of certain segments of DNA by use of thermostable DNA polymerase,
deoxynucleotides and oligonucleotide primers. The DNA fragments are
multiplicated during 40 cycles of temperature shuttling between +94°C,
+36°C and +72°C.
- Electrophoretic
separation of the fragments based on size followed by staining with ethidium
bromide. Visual detection of bands under UV light.
- The
presence of a band is scored as 1 and the absence as 0. The resulting
matrix is evaluated by statistical procedures, and parameters as e.g.
genetic relatedness and heterozygosity are calculated.
GENETIC VARIABILITY
During the initial evaluation of germplasm, ssp. mongolica
was shown to be susceptible to various diseases in
|
Fig.
1. Sampling sites for Hippophae rhamnoides ssp. rhamnoides. |
|
Fig.
2. UPGMA dendrogram of the genetic relationship among populations of Hippophae
rhamnoides. (For population origins, see Fig. 1.) |
The need for native germplasm from ssp. rhamnoides
prompted the research on how the genetic variation is partitioned within and
among native populations in northern
Since sea buckthorn is dioecious, wind
pollinated, and obligately outcrossing, one would expect to find much variation
within populations and very little variation between populations. In trembling
aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), another dioecious species, 97% of
the RAPD variability (Table 1) was found within the populations (Yeh et al.
1995). In Norway spruce (Picea abies), an outcrossing species, 95% of
the isoenzyme variability was found within populations (Lagercrantz and Ryman
1990). Both trembling aspen and Norway spruce are widespread and continuously
distributed. In Brazilwood (Caesalpinia echinata Lam.), another
outbreeding species, RAPD variability within populations accounted for only 42%
(Cardosos et al. 1998). This was suggested to be the result of discontinuous
distribution that have lead to the isolation of small populations. Inbreeding
and/or genetic drift has then increased the differentiation between
populations.
Table 1. Comparison of the within
population variability component in different outcrossing species.
Species |
Variability within populations (%) |
Distribution |
Population size |
Trembling aspen Populus tremuloides |
97 |
continuous |
large |
|
95 |
continuous |
large |
Sea buckthorn Hippophae rhamnoides ssp. rhamnoides
|
85 |
discontinuous |
?? |
Brazilwood Caesalpinia echinata |
42 |
discontinuous |
small |
Sea
buckthorn appears to have differentiated more than trembling aspen and Norway
spruce. The history of sea buckthorn in northern
A previous study based on isozymes showed
differences in partitioning of genetic variation when ssp. sinensis and
ssp. rhamnoides were compared, with the latter showing less similarity
between populations (Yao and Tigerstedt 1993). Here too, the differences may be
explained by differences in population sizes and/or the continuity in spatial
distribution.
GENDER DETERMINATION
Since sea buckthorn is dioecious, plant breeding
projects aim at producing both female and male cultivars. However, breeding
objectives for female and male cultivars differ and, generally, there are more
quality criteria to be met in a female cultivar. Therefore, the selection
pressure is higher on female cultivars and as a consequence, larger seedling
population size is needed to obtain a certain number of female selections than
to obtain the same number of male selections. Much of work and money could thus
be saved if a large proportion of the males could be discarded already at an
early stage in the evaluation process.
|
Fig.
3. Sex-linked RAPD marker amplified with primer OPD15 in individual
plants from the cross 'Leikora' × 'Pollmix 1'. Lanes 1 to 15 are females,
lanes 16 to 29 are males. The male specific band OPD15-600 is indicated with
an arrow. M stands for molecular size marker. |
Gender is most often genetically determined in
dioecious plants, either by distinguishable sex chromosomes or by alleles at
one or several loci on non-distinguishable chromosomes (Irish and Nelson 1989;
Durand and Durand 1990). The presence of distinguishable sex chromosomes in sea
buckthorn was suggested by Shchapov (1979), although this has not been
substantiated in other studies. Previously gender determination based on RAPD
markers has been successful in Silene latifolia (Mulcahy et al. 1992), Pistacia
vera (Hormaza et al. 1994), Asparagus officinalis (Jiang and Sink
1997), and Atriplex garettii (Ruas et al. 1998). Recently, we studied
the usefulness of RAPD markers for gender determination in sea buckthorn
(Persson and Nybom 1998). Two F1
progenies were investigated (34 plants derived from the cross 'Leikora' and
'Pollmix 1' and 22 plants derived from the cross BHi 10224 and 2-24). When
flowering, the gender of the plants were determined. The analyses were
performed as a bulked segregant analysis (BSA). DNA was extracted from each
individual and two bulks were produced in each cross, one from the males and
the other from the females. Out of 78 primers tested, four seemed to yield
partitioning between male and female bulks and these four primers were chosen
for further amplification at individual plant level. The band OPD15-600 (Fig. 3)
was present in all males in the offspring of 'Leikora' × 'Pollmix 1' as well as
in the father, 'Pollmix 1' and absent in all female offspring of the same cross
as well as in the mother, 'Leikora'. However, this band was present in only one
of the males and in none of the females in the other cross. Unfortunately, this
marker was not therefore universal and could be used for gender determination
in only one of our progenies.
CONCLUSIONS
We used RAPD markers to determine genetic
variation between and within native populations and to measure relatedness
between populations. Such investigations can be used as guidelines for
collection of germplasm in native stands but also to develop strategies for a
breeding program. One marker was found to be present only in male genotypes of
a progeny and in the father while it was absent in all females and the mother.
This marker was useful only in one hybrid progeny out of two tested, and search
for a more general marker will be undertaken, now that we have at least obtained
evidence that gender is genetically determined in sea buckthorn. In a dioecious
crop as sea buckthorn, molecular markers for fruit quality traits could also be
a powerful tool when selecting the male parent to be used in crosses. RAPD band
patterns can serve as fingerprints for genotype identification in vegetatively
propagated crops, and can therefore be useful also for gene bank management.
REFERENCES
·
Albrecht, H.-J. 1990. Sortenentwicklung bei
Sanddorn. Gartenbauwissenshaft 37:207–208.
·
Bartish, I.V., N. Jeppsson, and H. Nybom. 1999.
Population genetic structure in the dioecious pioneer plant species Hippophae
rhamnoides investigated by RAPD markers. Molecular Ecol. 8:791–802.
·
Cardosos, M.A., J. Provan, W. Powell, C.G.
Ferreira, and D.E. De Oliveira. 1998. High genetic differentiation among
remnant population of the endangered Caesalpinia echinata Lam.
(Leguminose-Caesalpinioideae). Molecular Ecol. 7:601–608.
·
Durand, R. and B. Durand. 1990. Sexual
determination and sexual differentiation. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 9:295–316.
·
Hormaza, J.I., L. Dollo, and V.S. Polito. 1994.
Identification of a RAPD marker linked to sex determination in Pistacia vera
using bulked segregant analysis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89:9–13.
·
Huang, Q. 1995. A review of seabuckthorn
breeding in
·
Irish, E.E. and T. Nelson. 1989. Sex
determination in monoecious and dioecious plants. Plant Cell 1:737–744.
·
Jiang, C. and K.C. Sink. 1997. RAPD and SCAR
markers linked to the sex expression locus M in asparagus. Euphytica 94:
329–333.
·
Lagercrantz, U. and N. Ryman. 1990. Genetic
structure of Norway spruce (Picea abies): Concordance of morphological
and allozyme variation. Evolution 44:38–53.
·
Li, T.S.C. and W.R. Schroeder.
·
Kalinina, I.P. and Y.I. Panteleyeva. 1987.
Breeding of sea buckthorn in the Altai. In: Advances in Agricultural Science.
·
Mulcahy, D.L., N.F. Weeden, R. Kesseli, and S.B.
Carroll. 1992. DNA probes for the Y-chromosome of Silene latifolia, a
dioecious angiosperm. Sexual Plant Reprod. 5:86–88.
·
Persson, H.A. and H. Nybom. 1998. Genetic sex
determination and RAPD marker segregation in the dioecious species sea buckthorn
(Hippophae rhamnoides L.). Hereditas 129:45–51.
·
Ruas, C.F., D.J.
·
Sandegren, R. 1943. Hippophae rhamnoides
L. i Sverige under senkvartär tid. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift. 37:1–26. (in
Swedish with German summary).
·
·
Trajkovski, V. and N. Jeppsson. 1999.
Domestication of sea buckthorn. Botanica Lithuanica Suppl. 2:37–46.
·
Weising, K., H. Nybom, K. Wolff, and W. Meyer.
1995. DNA fingerprinting in plants and fungi. CRC Press,
·
·
·
Yeh, F.C., D.K.X. Chong, and R.C. Yang. 1995.
RAPD variation within and among natural populations of trembling aspen (Populus
tremuloides Michx.) from
Comentarii
Trimiteți un comentariu