Seabuckthorn breeding
Seabuckthorn breeding on eco-economic improvement purpose
—Superior plant selection in F1 generation
of ssp mongolica and ssp. sinensis
Jin Zhengpin Wen Xiufeg Lun Shunguang
Jin Shuyuan
China
Administration Center for Seabuckthorn Development (CACSD)
wenxf@icrts.org
It has been well know that the genes’ newly combination will result much
variation within the filial generation, so the fine plant selection standards
has been established based on the study of genetic character variation in F1
generation population which got by hybridization between ssp. mongolica and
ssp. sinensis. 3 fine plant has been selected from 1500 female plants of filial
generation population. 3 of them are with both parents advantages: like as
growing is much better than parents and local sinensis; without any irrigation,
the fruit size and fruit productivity of plant is much higher than average
value of filial population, female parent and local sinensis, the selection
intensity of fruit productivity is 3; the thorns are significantly less than
selected population and siensis; the fruit with higher quality, especial oil
and Ve content. But under water intimidate, the fruit productivity will be
influenced, so forth more trails on resistance to hard ecological conditions of
selected trees need done on different plantation sites.
Key words: ssp. sinensis, ssp. mongolica, F1
generation, genetic variation, superior selection
Seabuckthorn is one of the most magical plant resources
with higher value of economy and ecology. In China, the state input on
seabuckthorn plantation for soil and water erosion control and environment
improvement in semi-arid areas of north hills the gulls, at same time, the
farmers get more income by seabuckthorn fruit harvesting, and the processing
companies achieve a great industry profit by seabuckthorn products.
Seabuckthorn
plantation area is more than 1.5 million hm2, but almost all the seedling are
seedlings of spp. sinensis, which are with strong resistance to dry
weather and poor soil conditions, with rich bio-chemical substances in fruit [1][2],
but it has a small fruit size, short pedicel and heavy thorns[3].
The advantage
features of ssp. mongolica, mainly distributed Russia, Mongolia, especially the
superior varieties selected form their population, are with big fruit size,
long pedicel, more yield and less thorns as well as easy for harvesting [4][5][6].
Since later of last 80’s , a large number of seabuckthorn cultivated varieties
have been introduced from Russia and Mongolia, which have been proved that the
introduced varieties were easy to be infected by pathogenic bacteria and insects,
not suit to the arid or semi-arid climate in north and north west of China. So
the first thing the breeders take consideration is how to use these rich seabuckthorn
resources in breeding programmer.
Since last 80’s, the
seabuckthorn breeding has achieved a great achievement by three ways, first one
is research to the natural seabuckthorn resources distributed in China, and got
the superior provenance by provenance trails, and also got some superior
families and then established their progeny testing plantations [1] [2].
The second way is introduction, lots of cultivated seabuckthorn varieties were
introduced from Russia and Mongolia, most of them are ssp. mongolica,
some cultivated varieties have been practiced in cultivation after selection
and clone trails. The third is now we did is hybridization between sub-species
(ssp. sinensis and ssp. mongolica).
This paper introduced one of the
hybridization and superior plant selection in F1 population.
1.
Hybridization
method
1.1 the objectives of hybridization
breeding
The concept of eco-economy breeding was
proposed based on the Chinese condition: great
population, less cultivated lands [12] [15] [16].
The objectives of this research is to achieve the superior plants by selection
from F1 population of ssp. sinensis and ssp. mongolica, which are
with big fruit size, less thorns, rich bio-substances as well as with higher
capability to resistance hardy eco-condition [14].
1.2 Material selection
1.2.1
Female
parent
“Wulanshalin” as the female parent is
the clone selected from the seedlings of “Ulanugon”
with the features as following. Tree height is about
1.5-2m, the shape is bush like, fruit colour is orange-yellow, the pedicel is 4
mm long, the 100 fruit weight is 50 g growing under better soil and water,
single plant yield is about 5 kg, almost no thorn on branches, the leaves long
is 5-6 cm, the width is about 8-9 mm.
1.2.2
Male
parent
“Fengning” as the
male parent is the superior eco-type selected from the ssp. sinensis
population of Fengning, Heibei province. It’s height is about 2-2.5 m, bush’s
shape, less thorns, leave’ longs 5-6 cm, width is 8-9 mm.
1.3 Hybridization
1.3.1 Sub-species of
sinensis and mongolica have a corresponding florescence period in China, so the
artificial pollinated was done in 1997, and the seeds of F1 were gotten by
hybridization, about 5000 seedlings gotten in 1998.
1.3.2 F1 progeny
testing plantation
In 1999, the F1 testing
plantation established at seabuckthorn breeding base of Jiuchenggong, Inner Mongolia (Picture 1). Total 4900 plants
were planted in 1m×3m
way, about 1.5 hm2. The soil within 2 meters deep are sandy soil
which are poor for water preserve. The under ground water is beyond 2 m, the
water content in soil is so low. Under such poor condition, the F1 seedlings
not only can grow well but also can bloom and bear fruit well.
3056 plant preserved in 2003,
the preserved rate is 62%, male and female plants is 1 to 1, most plants grow well in progeny testing
plantation.
2.
Method
of superior plant selection
In 2002, the F1 population began to bear
fruit. In 2003, most of the plants had a certain yield.
The superior plant selection are established base on the
study of F1 population phenotype’s variation.
2.1 Features of phenotype and variation of F1 population
The research
objectives are followings: 50 female sample plants from F1 population, 10
plants from female parent clone population, and 50 female plants from local sinensis
artificial plantation. The value of phenotype features from different
populations are shown in the table 1. The Fig 1, Fig 2, Fig 3, Fig 4, Fig 5,
Fig 6 shown the frequency of phenotype’s features from different population.
Table 1 Phenotype
features of populations(2003,
2004)
|
F1 population
|
Female
|
sinensis
population
|
Heiht(cm)
|
222
|
132
|
161
|
Crown diameter(cm)
|
186
|
150
|
172
|
Thorns(thorns/10cm)
|
1.34
|
0.2
|
3.5
|
Fruit long (mm)
|
8.0
|
8.7
|
5.9
|
Fruit shape
coefficient
|
1.03
|
1.19
|
0.98
|
Pedicel long (mm)
|
3.0
|
3.7
|
2.0
|
100 fruit weight (g)
|
26.2
|
28
|
11.8
|
Yield (kg/plant)
|
0.92
|
1.2
|
1.08
|
The figures above showed that
the phenotypes have much variation because of gene re-combination from male and
female parents in the F1 population. The plant height and growing power of
filial plants are more stronger than parents population, about 84% of F1
plants, 100 fruits weighs over 20g, (sinensis only 4% plants ) and 78%
of F1 plants, the pedicel is longer than 2.5 mm, (14 % only in sinensis). And
84% plant in F1 population, the thorns density is less than 2 thorns /10 cm,
(only 2% plants in sinensis). And no disease infected plants had been
found in the F1 population. Table 2 is the phenotype CV values of F1 and local sinensis
population.
Table 2
CV (%) values of phenotype
Features
|
F1 population
|
sinensis population
|
Average
|
Height
|
19.9
|
20.9
|
20.4
|
Crown
|
19.6
|
19.5
|
19.6
|
Ground diameter
|
22.4
|
33.9
|
28.2
|
Fruit length
|
9.9
|
9.7
|
9.8
|
Fruit width
|
8.3
|
8.8
|
8.6
|
100 fruit weight
|
22.7
|
23.6
|
23.2
|
Pedicel
|
17.9
|
19.6
|
18.8
|
Yield
|
176.5
|
107.5
|
142.0
|
Thorns on fruit
branch
|
53.3
|
19.2
|
36.3
|
From this table, we can find
that some features have a great variation in seedlings plantation, for example
the productivity of plant and the thorns on new sprouts. It means we can get
more better plants with great improvement on these phenotype features. But it
is difficult to choose ones with other features, especially the improvement on
fruit size and long pedicel.
2.2 The criteria of
superior plant selection
But as a matter of
fact, it is impossible for us to get single plant excellent enough to be with
every features best. So according to the degree of importance, we gave the
different weight to some key features: 0.1 to volume of tree, 0.3 to plant
productivity, 0.3 to 100 fruit weight, 0.1 to fruit pedicle and 0.1 to thorns
on new sprout. we got the comprehensive selection index, and put them in order
(table 3)
Table 3
Front 10 plants in comprehensive selection index list
|
Volume of crown(m3)
|
yield
(kg)
|
100 fruit weight
(g)
|
Pedicel
(mm)
|
thorns
(thorns/10cm)
|
Selection index
|
1
|
5.2
|
1.910
|
24.90
|
3.4
|
1.64
|
0.406
|
2
|
5.4
|
0.870
|
35.70
|
3.2
|
1.21
|
0.427
|
3
|
4.4
|
2.600
|
21.00
|
3.3
|
0.29
|
0.438
|
4
|
5.0
|
2.500
|
27.20
|
3.1
|
1.25
|
0.445
|
5
|
5.1
|
1.800
|
29.80
|
4.1
|
0.89
|
0.455
|
6
|
5.2
|
0.050
|
27.00
|
3.4
|
0.06
|
0.519
|
7
|
5.9
|
1.700
|
43.70
|
3.6
|
0.25
|
0.576
|
8
|
6.2
|
5.000
|
30.60
|
3.2
|
1.44
|
0.610
|
9
|
4.4
|
5.200
|
35.80
|
2.7
|
0.34
|
0.652
|
10
|
7.0
|
5.900
|
28.80
|
3.2
|
0.66
|
0.660
|
But the comprehensive selection index is not the only
criteria for our selection. For example, the No. 7 is with bigger fruit size,
less thorns, and the pedicel is longer, but the productivity is lower; the No.
8 is with bigger fruit size, higher yields, but the thorns are heavy. So we
have done the regulation to the criteria based on our breeding objectives
(Table 4).
Comentarii
Trimiteți un comentariu